Elena Kagan is an Avowed Socialist

Tagged:

Erick Erickson over at Redstate.com has posted Elena Kagan’s College Thesis and after reading it, I for one, will advocate for the GOP, Tea Party activists, and all freedom loving Americans to live up to the moniker thrust upon us as the party of no as to her confirmation. In fact when it comes to the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court I say “Hell No!”

Please sign Liberty First PAC’s petition in opposition to the confirmation of Elena Kagan. Let everyone know that you strongly oppose the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court of the United States of America!!!

Online Petition

As Erick points out “This proves Elena Kagan is an open and avowed socialist. The woman declares that socialists must stick together instead of fracture in order to advance a socialist agenda, which Kagan advocates.” here are a couple of quotes from her conclusion:

In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than pf socialism’s greatness. conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?

-Snip-

The story is a sad but. also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America.Rad~ca1s have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if ‘the history of Local New York shows anything, it- is·thpt American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.

The spin will obviously be that this was a long time ago and that somehow she was being an objective observer of history../blah, blah, blah but the fact that she chose this topic to write her collage thesis is very telling… Very telling, indeed! This is defiantly one of the main reasons the White House has kept her away from the press opting instead to have her interviewed by a staffer who’s a member of the internal White House press agency. Can you say propaganda anyone?

Here’s the thesis in it’s entirety